Fuji xt4 vs nikon z7

I caught up with a good mate over the weekend. As a Fujifilm user, he had the latest X-T3, so we decided to swap cameras to allow us to play around and get our thoughts. It was an excellent opportunity to see where the camera designs were going, and I put together my thoughts on the two.

X-T4 vs A7III vs Z6 – IBIS & Video Quality Comparison

This is my mate, Gregone of the nicest people you will ever meet. Firstly off, grabbing the Fujifilm after 3 weeks of Sonyland still felt familiar, so in some respects it was disappointing. Ultimately the vast majority of the changes were internal, and the X-T series has a good design. With switching to Sony, I was presented with a completely new camera, because obviously, a Sony is different from a Fujifilm.

The Sony A7iii vs Fujifilm X-T3

If I was coming from the Sony A7ii to the A7iii, it is likely it would have been the same. From a looks perspective, you have to give it to Fujifilm, they are good-looking cameras. Taking a stock photograph of a Fujifilm is easy, as my Instagram account can attest to. The X-T3 looks retro like the X-T2, a little more timeless and I suspect if you looked at both cameras in 10 years, the Fujifilm would still look exactly as good as it did now.

The Sony, on the other hand, is likely to look dated. Fortunately, I have no intention of keeping my A7iii longer than about 5 years so I should be okay in that regard, but for those that feel that looks are important, the Fujifilm cameras will be popular.

In my case, as an ugly middle-aged old man, having good-looking cameras might make me look worse so the Sony might be a better fit. I did some size comparison between the X-H1 and the A7 a while back, but when you put the X-T3 alongside the A7, you realise what an incredible job Sony did with the size of the A7. It is a phenomenal feat of engineering. Put the A7iii with the Zeiss 35mmF2. When you compare the size of the images at camerasize.

More incredibly, Sony shoved in a battery with twice the battery life and full-frame sensor. Whatever your thoughts are on Sony, that is damn impressive from an engineering perspective. Looking across both cameras, they are both outstanding quality, and you have to nitpick to complain about the quality in any areas. I think the construction on both is excellent, however, the one area where Sony has let itself down is the covers for the USB-C which are dangly and have a really low-quality feel.

Fujifilm have almost nothing complain about from this perspective so they really have met the brief from a quality perspective and I have to give this to them. I suspect long-term DSLR users will probably prefer Sony for the simple reason the default handling will be in line with what they are comfortable with.

So where are my thoughts on this? I do like having controls on the body, but in the same respect, it comes with both positives and negatives. For example, the option of having dials as opposed to physical controls with values on them is that you can pre-define multiple custom modes not available on the X-T2 Q Menu. With Sony, you could create a custom mode for landscapes with maximum aperture, minimum ISO and a default shutter, or one for sports with specific focus settings.

The Q Menu fails in this regard. As a result, on the ergonomics, I think that splits it, half and half, the ergonomics are good on both cameras and will appeal for different things, they both have pros and cons.

The Sigma Art mm — There is a reason they call it the Art series. From a features perspective, Sony definitely wins, but Fujifilm gets the nod from a menu usability perspective. Does it match the A7iii? There seems to be some lag when the subject moves. It could still be keeping it in focus, but there is a delayed response on the movement of the eye focus, which seems to indicate not.

I also find that Fujifilm appears to need more to get the Eye-AF like it needs a whole head.Update: Fuji Rumors has reported that the new Fujifilm X-T4 will be receiving a brand new battery that we've never seen before. Aside from a minor improvement from the X-T2 to the X-T3 due to a more energy efficient processor, there hasn't been much significant change.

However, that will all change with the release of the Fujifilm X-T4. We can only assume that it's been designed specifically for the X-T4 system to give users more efficient batteries. This will come as welcome news to Fujifilm fans, who have been calling for better battery life for years now. The Fujifilm X-T4 has received a lot of online attention recently, with leaks springing forth so frequently it might as well be a colander. However, this latest batch of rumors is particularly interesting.

Apparently, the Fujifilm X-T3's successor will not only have IBIS something that was conspicuously missing from its predecessorbut will also have an improved battery life and "best in class" EVF.

These rumors were reported by Fuji Rumors, who did caution to take the information with a grain of salt as it came from an anonymous source. We had already heard about the inclusion of IBIS in the Fujifilm X-T4but the other two tidbits of information are new - and certainly very interesting.

One of the biggest questions we have about these juicy new rumors relates to the improved battery life. Does this mean that Fujifilm have been able to squeeze new levels of efficiency out of the existing X-T3 batteries, or will we be receiving a brand new battery shape?

If there will be an entirely new battery for the Fujifilm X-T4, this then raises the question about what this would mean about the body of the camera. A larger battery would either require some internal juggling, or a larger camera body. Currently the Fujifilm X-T3 has quite a slim profile, with a relatively small grip.

Sony A7iii 85mm F1.4 GM vs Nikon Z6 85mm F1.4G (City Portraits) w/ @kyleighglover

In our opinion, increasing the size of the grip and providing the camera with a larger battery that lasts for longer could be a win-win situation. While we appreciate that the traditional draw of mirrorless cameras is that they're small and light, the Nikon Z7 proves that you can have a small camera with a decent ergonomic grip.

fuji xt4 vs nikon z7

While these rumors may prove to be false, they're certainly very interesting. The Fujifilm X-T4 is due to be released in February, so it won't be long until we find out exactly what improvements have been made on the X-T3. Best Fujifilm lenses : perfect zoom and prime lenses for your X-mount camera Fujifilm GFX vs GFX 50S : key differences between the two cameras Best medium format camera : big sensor cameras for experts and pros.

Please deactivate your ad blocker in order to see our subscription offer. Image credit: Fujifilm We had already heard about the inclusion of IBIS in the Fujifilm X-T4but the other two tidbits of information are new - and certainly very interesting.

Read more Best Fujifilm lenses : perfect zoom and prime lenses for your X-mount camera Fujifilm GFX vs GFX 50S : key differences between the two cameras Best medium format camera : big sensor cameras for experts and pros.

See more News articles. See all comments 1.Overview Prices Specs. Comparison winner. Fujifilm X-T3. Scroll down for more details. Which are the most popular comparisons? Design 1. Has a flip-out screen.

Nikon Z6. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a built-in focus motor. The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus.

fuji xt4 vs nikon z7

For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. We consider a lower weight better because lighter devices are more comfortable to carry. A lower weight is also an advantage for home appliances, as it makes transportation easier, and for many other types of products.

With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. The device is dustproof and water-resistant. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water.

Optics 1. The larger the sensor the more light the sensor captures yielding in better image quality. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera.

A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. However, the megapixel count is not the only important element determining the quality of an image.

With a higher light sensitivity ISO levelthe sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.

With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus shots. Videography 1. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions.

Has phase-detection autofocus for videos. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.The X-T4 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camerawhile the XV is a fixed lens compact. Both cameras are equipped with an APS-C sensor.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison. Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm X-T4 and the Fujifilm XV? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Fujifilm X-T4 and the Fujifilm XV is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown.

All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter. If the front view area width x height of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Fujifilm XV is notably smaller 24 percent than the Fujifilm X-T4. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and dust-proof and can, hence, be used in inclement weather conditions or harsh environments.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the XV has a lens built in, whereas the X-T4 is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup.

The battery packs of both cameras can be charged via USBwhich can be very convenient when travelling. The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, just use the right or left arrows in the table to switch to the respective camera. Alternatively, you can also navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from the full list of cameras there.

fuji xt4 vs nikon z7

Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The XV was launched at a lower price than the X-T4, despite having a lens built in.The Fujifilm X-T4 and the Nikon Z7 are two enthusiast cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in February and August Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm X-T4 and the Nikon Z7?

Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers. An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Fujifilm X-T4 and the Nikon Z7 is provided in the side-by-side display below.

The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown.

All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter. If the front view area width x height of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Nikon Z7 is notably larger 8 percent than the Fujifilm X-T4. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and dust-proof and can, hence, be used in inclement weather conditions or harsh environments.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems. The battery packs of both cameras can be charged via USBwhich can be very convenient when travelling. The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators.

If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, just use the right or left arrows in the table to switch to the respective camera. Alternatively, you can also navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from the full list of cameras there. Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting.

The X-T4 was launched at a markedly lower price by 50 percent than the Z7, which puts it into a different market segment. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market. The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality.

All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic rangeand richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation.

Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses. The sensor area in the Z7 is percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio sensor width to sensor height of With However, the X-T4 is a somewhat more recent model by 1 year and 6 months than the Z7, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units.

Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves. The resolution advantage of the Nikon Z7 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the Z7 for good quality output dots per inch amounts to The corresponding values for the Fujifilm X-T4 are For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark.

The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.I have a Fuji X-H1, and a nice set of Fuji lenses. I love the Fuji colors, and increasingly I am actually shooting for the JPEGs almost as much as the raws - great colors and much less work in post-processing.

Fujifilm X-T4 vs X100V

So I am not in hurry to upgrade, but I am considering upgrade options. I shoot a wide variety of photography. I do some event shooting, I do a lot of bird and wildlife photography I really love thatand some studio portraits — I am considering going semi-professional doing some paid work. But right now, I mostly shoot for pleasure. My upgrade decision is driven by my bird photography in particular - I would like better autofocus. The X-H1 is good, I use the medium sized zone in the center of the sensor where the PDAF points are located, and the camera does alright as long as my subject is in the center of the frame.

But I would like my next camera to have better autofocus, with the points across the whole frame. The Fuji X-T4 sounds attractive in this regard, but so do some other cameras.

My other wildlife photography concern is relates to high ISO performance. I shoot at a high shutter speed to freeze action when I am shooting birds.

However, the results in high ISO pictures in most scenarios, unless it is a very bright scene I usually set ISO to auto, capped at Is improved ISO performance worth a potential sacrifice of those amazing Fuji jpegs? For bird photography, I've used a Z7 with the mm PF for a while and overall I was quite happy with the autofocus performance using one of the central area modes, but never used wide area. I didn't enjoy the experience much, though, and it was for me a relief when Olympus got their act together with the EM1X and later the firmware update for the Mark II which really benefited the mm prime.

I still think the Z's aufofocus is a bit better but there's more than AF to photography and it wasn't a night and day difference. The new AF tracking facility looks really promising, too. Here are our first impressions using it. But now that's it's here, what is it really like to use?

Find out in our initial review based on hands-on time with the camera. The R6 doesn't promise quite such headline-grabbing specs as its big brother, but it still packs a punch, whether you shoot stills, video or both. With fast burst speeds, great video quality and impressive autofocus, the 1D X III is equal parts cinema rig and sports shooter.

Find out how it fares against steep competition in our full review. Its 20MP Four Thirds sensor is paired with clever tracking audio technology, but we have our reservations. If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that might be a bit older but still offer a lot of bang for the buck.

What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. Submit a News Tip! Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register.Welche hat die bessere Ausstattung und Akkulaufzeit? Welche sonstigen Unterschiede gibt es?

Die X-T4 steht links, die Z7 rechts:. Nachfolgende Infographiken vergleichen die Sucher bzw. Beide Digitalkameras haben die gleiche Punktzahl oder die Unterschiede sind zu gering, um eine eindeutige Empfehlung auszusprechen.

Quelle der technischen Daten und Bildnachweis: Hersteller. Diese Seite wurde durch ein experimentelles Computerprogramm generiert. Dieser Text kann Affiliatelinks zu Amazon. Weitere Informationen. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Welche GoPro kaufen? Kaufberatung Hero 7. Instax Sofortbild. Digitale Bilderrahmen. Zum RX Vergleich. Zum Reisezoom Vergleich.

Fujifilm X-T4 vs Sony a7 III vs Nikon Z6 Video Quality Comparison

Farben ersetzen, Textbearbeitung, Bilder skalieren Preis bei Amazon. X-T4 jetzt bei Amazon. Z7 jetzt bei Amazon.